![]() |
![]() |
Getting Started FAQ |
Client Login |
|
What's NewMaserati Recalls Nearly 1,800 GranTurismos for Possible Brake-Light FailureSuper Bowl 2012: Football Coaches and Players Need to Get Health Issues Through their Heads Computerized Tests for Concussions May Be Unreliable 'They Use You Up': Hall of Famer Dorsett Suing NFL Insurance Firms, NHL Face Off over Concussions Self-Driving Vehicles New Content:Dr. Jamshid Ghajar: Five Wheels on an Ambulance New Content:Dr. Jamshid Ghajar: Multiple Definitions of Concussion New Content:Dr. Jamshid Ghajar: Complex Project to Define Concussion Mind-Reading Advance Lets Brain Scientists 'Eavesdrop' on Thoughts |
Dog Bite Injury Claims: Strict Liability
Author: Richard H. Adler Dogs hold a special position of affection and importance in the hearts and minds of most members of the community, and have earned the well deserved reputation as "man's best friend". Over the years, however, particularly in the Puget Sound and other urbanized communities around Washington State, laws and policies have developed regarding the care and control of dogs in order to protect innocent bystanders and children. Children are the victims of the majority of dog bite wounds. On average about 14 people die every year from dog attacks, and about 10 of these fatalities are children. Larger dogs like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepards are most community associated with dog bites, but it is important to remember that any dog may bite and can inflict serious bite wounds.
The laws of Washington State have established dog owners shall be held
responsible when their dog bites an innocent party. Specifically RCW
16.08.040 providers for a standard of "strict liability" on the dog
owner as follows: "Liability. The owner of any dog which shall bite any person while such person is in or on a public place or lawfully in or on a private place including the property of the owner of such dog, shall be liable for such damages as may be suffered by the person bitten, regardless of the former viciousness of such dog or the owner's knowledge of such viciousness."The law is straight forward - when the owner's dog bites someone else when that person is lawfully in a public place or on the dog owner's land, the dog owner is liable for any injuries or damages related to that dog bite. The policy and intention of the "strict liability" is to hold dog owners to a higher standard of responsibility as a matter of law because of the potential for significant traumatic injuries when a dog bites a person. The strict liability laws do not apply in all dog caused injury situations. For example, when there is evidence the dog was provoked leading to the person's injury, the owner is not strictly or automatically liable for those injuries. RCW 16.08.070 provides a complete and affirmative defense when provocation of a dog is involved: "Provocation as a defense. Proof of provocation of the attack by the injured person shall be a complete defense to an action for damages."Moreover, the strict liability statute addresses only dog bites and not other injuries which may occur when a dog is involved. An owner may be liability for his/her dog's actions if the dog causes injury by knocking somebody to the ground. In these circumstances, the traditional common law negligence in Washington State may apply if the finder of fact determines the dog owner was negligent by not keeping the dog under control or restraint. As stated by the Washington Supreme Court in Arnold vs Laird, 94 Washington 2nd 867 (1980): "It (is) clear a negligence cause of action arises when there is ineffective control of an animal in a situation where it would reasonably be expected that injury could occur."Here are some tips on preventing dog bites.
|
![]() "Richard was honest and upfront about all the possible outcomes and options in my situation. He got the job done and I would highly recommend him and his team to everyone.” Anonymous |
|